IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rowan Henderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-10 Country: Canada
Merrimack
Verbal HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sudbury Wolves OHL 66 11 13 24 0.364 0.2103 0.2269 0.9521 1.0273
2025-26 Sudbury Wolves OHL 62 12 20 32 0.516 0.2986 0.3071 1.3514 1.3901
2026-27 Sudbury Wolves OHL 6 4 3 7 1.167 0.6749 0.6749 3.0549 3.0549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20201
Forward overall
#633
Forward born in 2007
#834
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Walker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Caden Cranston
NCDC 2022-23
0.49
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Filip Karlsson Tägtström
SHL-J20 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Mavrick Lachance
QMJHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Logan Drevitch
NCDC 2017-18
0.27
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Gus Katsuras
Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.