← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mavrick Lachance Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-28 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 67 27 22 49 0.731 0.3593 0.3782 1.9528 2.0554
2024-25 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 52 34 25 59 1.135 0.5574 0.5593 3.0297 3.0400
2025-26 Chicoutimi Saguenéens QMJHL 61 23 34 57 0.934 0.4591 0.4389 2.4951 2.3855
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6672
Forward overall
#172
Forward born in 2006
#243
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
AJHL 2022-23
0.33
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2018-19
0.39
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2023-24
0.47
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.