IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Stephen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-22 Country: Canada
Stevenson
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Burlington Cougars OJHL 55 6 34 40 0.727 0.1783 0.1799 0.5007 0.5052
2024-25 Brampton Steelheads OHL 6 1 2 3 0.500 0.2893 0.2728 1.2848 1.2115
2025-26 — NAHL 40 4 11 15 0.375 0.1378 0.1294 0.3958 0.3716
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5756
Defenseman overall
#1440
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Stevenson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dominic Brenza
0.46
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Christopher Lee
0.58
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Hunter Brody
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stevenson
Jack Day
0.00
actual FR PPG at Stevenson

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Dietsch
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Reitter
Canton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Kulas
Utica · 2006-07
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.