← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayden Connors Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-26 Country: Canada
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 46 2 21 23 0.500 0.1226 0.1355 0.3443 0.3807
2024-25 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 27 8 17 25 0.926 0.2269 0.2392
2025-26 Sudbury Wolves OHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10193
Defenseman overall
#1393
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.29 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Boston College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
AJHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.23
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
QMJHL 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2011-12
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2009-10
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.