← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryder Cali Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-09-06 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 2, Pick #48  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Milton Menace OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 North Bay Battalion OHL 47 16 20 36 0.766 0.4431 0.4722 1.9682 2.0975
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9633
Forward overall
#95
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2022-23
0.60
actual FR PPG at Providence
WHL 2023-24
0.75
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2023-24
0.54
actual FR PPG at Providence
NTDP-U18 2019-20
0.53
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.444 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.