← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Bowes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-19 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 4, Pick #102  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0145 0.0165 0.0516 0.0589
2024-25 Ottawa 67's OHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 67 23 19 42 0.627 0.3627 0.3690 1.6108 1.6388
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18654
Forward overall
#545
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SuperElit 2016-17
0.23
actual FR PPG at Providence
BCHL 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at Providence
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2014-15
0.19
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.