← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Bowes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-19 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 4, Pick #102  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
Providence
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0145 0.0165 0.0511 0.0583
2024-25 Ottawa 67's OHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 67 23 19 42 0.627 0.3627 0.3690 1.6415 1.6701
2026-27 Ottawa 67's OHL 6 5 2 7 1.167 0.6749 0.6749 3.0549 3.0549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18969
Forward overall
#582
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Providence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2022-23
0.50
actual FR PPG at Providence
OHL 2023-24
0.34
actual FR PPG at Providence
NCDC 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Providence
USHL 2017-18
0.95
actual FR PPG at Providence

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.