IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Illia Shybinskyi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-14 Country: Ukraine
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 55 15 31 46 0.836 0.2050 0.2183 0.5757 0.6130
2025-26 Guelph Storm OHL 60 19 25 44 0.733 0.4242 0.4241 1.9201 1.9198
2026-27 Guelph Storm OHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0964 0.0964 0.4365 0.4365
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12134
Forward overall
#318
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cayden Casey
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Reilly Connors
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Dana Engram
USPHL-Elite 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Patrick Steinhauser
NAHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Karim Gayfullin
Curry · 2022-23
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Thompson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2003-04
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.