IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Illia Shybinskyi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-14 Country: Ukraine
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 55 15 31 46 0.836 0.2050 0.2183 0.5759 0.6132
2025-26 Guelph Storm OHL 60 19 25 44 0.733 0.4242 0.4241 1.8842 1.8839
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11921
Forward overall
#295
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
John Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Sam LeDrew
NE-Prep 2023-24
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Drew Smolcynski
USHL 2012-13
0.44
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Cayden Casey
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Jacob Pritchard
USHL 2013-14
0.62
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Donny Flynn
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Tarantino
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.