← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Swain Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHLP 36 7 11 18 0.500 0.0573 0.0583 0.1127 0.1147
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 EHL 33 1 4 5 0.151 0.0350 0.0341 0.0741 0.0723
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 9 1 4 5 0.556
2024-25 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 9 1 4 5 0.556
2023-24 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 9 1 4 5 0.556
2022-23 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 9 1 4 5 0.556
2021-22 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 9 1 4 5 0.556
2020-21 William Paterson University ACHA_D1 9 1 4 5 0.556

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18283
Defenseman overall
#3215
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.