IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anders Jonsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 North Yarmouth NE-Prep 33 3 4 7 0.212 0.0420 0.0420 0.0966 0.0966
2022-23 — EHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 — — 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14673
Defenseman overall
#2774
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Hope
Post · 2022-23
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Mecrones
Rivier · 2018-19
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Romzek
Nazareth · 2012-13
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.