IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aydin Thierolf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Boston Dukes EHL 43 11 11 22 0.512 0.1182 0.1241 0.2503 0.2628
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 34 13 21 34 1.000
2024-25 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 34 13 21 34 1.000
2023-24 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 34 13 21 34 1.000
2022-23 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 34 13 21 34 1.000
2021-22 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 34 13 21 34 1.000
2020-21 West Chester University ACHA_D1 — — 34 13 21 34 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31844
Forward overall
#1900
Forward born in 2005
#1042
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Ganz
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2022-23
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trace Jablin
Endicott · 2012-13
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mick Heneghan
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.