IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Duval Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-28 Country: USA
Assumption
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 37 6 7 13 0.351 0.0812 0.0851 0.1719 0.1802
2024-25 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 46 10 10 20 0.435 0.1004 0.1001 0.2127 0.2121
2025-26 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 50 21 15 36 0.720 0.1663 0.1564 0.3523 0.3313
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29910
Forward overall
#1761
Forward born in 2005
#917
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Assumption Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brett Baldassare
0.00
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Collin Montgomery
0.36
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Shane Sullivan
0.00
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Thomas McGaffigan
0.00
actual FR PPG at Assumption

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Smith
Worcester State · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Tinoco
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Dill
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.