← New Search ↗ Social Card

Porter Byrd-Leitner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-03 Country: USA
Colgate
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 23 4 8 12 0.522 0.1033 0.1033 0.2377 0.2377
2023-24 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 25 10 15 25 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 0.4556 0.4556
2024-25 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 50 19 34 53 1.060 0.3555 0.3573 0.9809 0.9859
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 48 8 11 19 0.396 0.2290 0.2134 1.0170 0.9478
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17901
Forward overall
#752
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

Colgate Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Colgate
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.20
actual FR PPG at Colgate
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Colgate
USHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colgate

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.