IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Benkert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-10 Country: USA
Misericordia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 8 2 6 8 1.000 0.2310 0.2435 0.4893 0.5158
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Christian Lampasso
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Misericordia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Marco Taffo
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
James Eng
0.67
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Trent Barker
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Patrick Toomey
0.38
actual FR PPG at Misericordia

D2/3 Comparables

Griffen Sanom
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Bisson
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Lagos
Skidmore · 2021-22
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.