IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaxon Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-07-03 Country: USA
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Ottawa 67's OHL 52 2 6 8 0.154 0.0890 0.0941 0.3952 0.4177
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49226
Forward overall
#998
Forward born in 2008
#1533
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Max Humitz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Ahlgren
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Evancho
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Matt Mendelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Wisconsin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Charlie Stramel
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.36
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Finn Brink
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.48
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Ryan Botterill
MJHL 2020-21
0.23
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
Caden Brown
USHL 2020-21
0.18
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Connolly
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Blake
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Archambeault
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.