← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peyton Hart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 46 14 22 36 0.783 0.1800 0.1938 0.2479 0.2669
2019-20 Austin Bruins NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 40 21 27 48 1.200 0.2760 0.2760 0.3802 0.3802
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 23 14 4 18 0.783
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 27 13 12 25 0.926
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 28 18 2 20 0.714
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 24 7 6 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2021-22 · Wisconsin-Stout
+226.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
100%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22709
Forward overall
#1121
Forward born in 2001
#562
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Canisius (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2004-05
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2003-04
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.