IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Rothstein

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Taft NE-Prep 25 7 11 18 0.720 0.1426 0.1426 0.3280 0.3280
2024-25 Taft NE-Prep 24 13 17 30 1.250 0.2476 0.2476 0.5695 0.5695
2025-26 Taft NE-Prep 24 8 27 35 1.458 0.2889 0.2889 0.6644 0.6644
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12043
Forward overall
#54
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Casey Severo
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.30
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Michael Callow
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Joe Miller
USHL 2020-21
0.85
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Richard Gallant
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.53
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Stevens
Middlebury · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Tyson
Hobart · 2015-16
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bo Webster
Hobart · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.