← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Severo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 29 15 22 37 1.276 0.2528 0.2528 0.5813 0.5813
2019-20 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 22 18 40 1.482 0.2935 0.2935 0.6750 0.6750
2020-21 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 43 5 16 21 0.488 0.2881 0.2881 1.4669 1.4669
2021-22 Madison Capitols USHL 48 16 27 43 0.896 0.5284 0.4702 2.6904 2.3941
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Harvard D1 ECAC SR 34 9 9 18 0.529
2024-25 Harvard D1 ECAC JR 33 16 12 28 0.849
2023-24 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 32 8 5 13 0.406
2022-23 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 27 2 6 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · Harvard
-13.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7545
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.