IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Carolan

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Williams
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 31 2 10 12 0.387 0.0767 0.0767 0.1764 0.1764
2024-25 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 32 4 10 14 0.438 0.0867 0.0867 0.1993 0.1993
2025-26 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 31 15 14 29 0.935 0.1853 0.1853 0.4262 0.4262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30389
Forward overall
#397
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Williams Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jake McManus
0.75
actual FR PPG at Williams
Nick Altmann
0.56
actual FR PPG at Williams
C.J. Shugart
0.59
actual FR PPG at Williams
Niko Karamanis
0.75
actual FR PPG at Williams

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Archambeault
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Payne
Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.