IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Najda

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 24 11 11 22 0.917 0.1816 0.1816 0.4176 0.4176
2025-26 Choate Rosemary Hall NE-Prep 26 11 13 24 0.923 0.1829 0.1829 0.4206 0.4206
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19771
Forward overall
#168
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Julian Frias
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Yale
Donovan Frias
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.40
actual FR PPG at Yale
David Chen
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Yale
Kurt Gurkan
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.25
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Payne
Concordia · 2006-07
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Fitzpatrick
Marian · 2005-06
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tamás Tóth
Hobart · 2021-22
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.