IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Puglisi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
2026 · Round 7, Pick #202  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Winchendon NE-Prep 28 6 13 19 0.679 0.1365 0.1365 0.3103 0.3103
2025-26 Winchendon NE-Prep 35 26 50 76 2.171 0.4367 0.4367 0.9930 0.9930
2026-27 Kitchener Rangers OHL 8 3 1 4 0.500 0.2893 0.2893 1.3092 1.3092
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7553
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Louie Wehmann
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Michael Regush
BCHL 2016-17
0.42
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Maxim Andreev
NAHL 2016-17
0.45
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Parker Murray
BCHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Yuel
Curry · 2004-05
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.