IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Gingeleskie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 5 7 12 0.462 0.0928 0.0928 0.2110 0.2110
2025-26 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 14 11 7 18 1.286 0.2586 0.2586 0.5880 0.5880
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19304
Forward overall
#137
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

James Shannon
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.37
actual FR PPG at Yale
Kurt Gurkan
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.25
actual FR PPG at Yale
Briggs Gammill
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.44
actual FR PPG at Yale
Eli Friedman
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ryan
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard McCartney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brad Michalchuk
Middlebury · 2000-01
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.