IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddox Boyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Colgate
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Kent School NE-Prep 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.0619 0.0619 0.1407 0.1407
2025-26 Kent School NE-Prep 25 12 17 29 1.160 0.2333 0.2333 0.5305 0.5305
2026-27 Houston Bulls NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0525 0.1510 0.1510
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24108
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colgate Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Max Nagel
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Austin Smith
USHS-MN 2025-26
0.84
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Porter Byrd-Leitner
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colgate
Tyler Penner
MJHL 2013-14
0.10
actual FR PPG at Colgate

D2/3 Comparables

Beau Depencier
Manhattanville · 2022-23
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Morton
Fredonia · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.