IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Finn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Assumption
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 33 0 4 4 0.121 0.0240 0.0240 0.0552 0.0552
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28928
Defenseman overall
#2027
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Assumption Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Rory Hammersmith
0.00
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Robbie Roche
0.36
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Dean Simeone
0.15
actual FR PPG at Assumption
Chris Stackhouse
0.13
actual FR PPG at Assumption

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Gaudry
Castleton · 2009-10
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Viola
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Thornton
Castleton · 2010-11
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.