IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Toll

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 2 17 19 0.704 0.0891 0.0891 0.1709 0.1709
2023-24 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 8 24 32 1.185 0.1500 0.1500 0.2879 0.2879
2024-25 Rosemount USHS-MN 27 13 36 49 1.815 0.2298 0.2298 0.4408 0.4408
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11081
Forward overall
#316
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Luc Laylin
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Casy Laylin
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Joshua Giuliani
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Attila Lippai
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.19
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Jones
University of New England · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.