← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Grossklaus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-23 Country: USA
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Woodbury USHS-MN 27 10 23 33 1.222 0.1547 0.1547 0.2969 0.2969
2023-24 Woodbury USHS-MN 26 27 18 45 1.731 0.2191 0.2191 0.4204 0.4204
2024-25 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 4 15 19 0.322 0.1899 0.1975 0.9671 1.0060
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 64 17 17 34 0.531 0.2584 0.2556 1.3034 1.2894
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17404
Forward overall
#499
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.58
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.27
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2000-01
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2000-01
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.