IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sam Peckham

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Edina USHS-MN 31 1 23 24 0.774 0.0980 0.0980 0.1881 0.1881
2024-25 Edina USHS-MN 31 3 22 25 0.806 0.1021 0.1021 0.1959 0.1959
2025-26 Edina USHS-MN 31 2 7 9 0.290 0.0368 0.0368 0.0705 0.0705
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36493
Forward overall
#2404
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kyle Penney
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Dan McIntyre
BCHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sullivan Mack
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Ryan Walsh
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Eamonn Miller
Salem State · 2016-17
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Robbie Roche
Assumption · 2015-16
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Szeremley
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.