← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isabel Burt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0151 0.0151
2018-19 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 0 2 2 0.083 0.0126 0.0126
2019-20 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 6 4 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604
2020-21 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 20 7 3 10 0.500 0.0755 0.0755
2021-22 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Catherine D3 MIAC SR 25 2 0 2 0.080
2024-25 St. Catherine D3 MIAC 25 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 St. Catherine D3 MIAC 23 2 0 2 0.087
2022-23 St. Catherine D3 MIAC 23 6 1 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · St. Catherine
+1069.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11042
Forward overall
#3865
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.