← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Latimer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-10 Country: Canada
2021 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #123  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0811 0.0811 0.4085 0.4085
2020-21 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 22 5 11 16 0.727 0.3538 0.3538 1.7821 1.7821
2021-22 WHL 62 18 22 40 0.645 0.3139 0.3073 1.5809 1.5476
2022-23 WHL 53 14 26 40 0.755 0.3672 0.3423 1.8492 1.7240
2023-24 Red Deer Rebels WHL 35 10 15 25 0.714 0.3475 0.3068 1.7502 1.5454
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SO 35 7 6 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2025-26 · Michigan Tech
+35.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11926
Forward overall
#545
Forward born in 2003
#649
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2002-03
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.