← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Latimer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-10 Country: Canada
2021 · Round 4, Pick #123  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally
Univ. of British Columbia · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0811 0.0811 0.4090 0.4090
2020-21 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 22 5 11 16 0.727 0.3538 0.3538 1.7846 1.7846
2021-22 WHL 62 18 22 40 0.645 0.3139 0.3073 1.5831 1.5497
2022-23 WHL 53 14 26 40 0.755 0.3672 0.3423 1.8518 1.7264
2023-24 Red Deer Rebels WHL 35 10 15 25 0.714 0.3475 0.3068 1.7527 1.5476
2024-25 Univ. of British Columbia USports-M 28 8 11 19 0.679 0.3580 0.3797 1.9890 2.1096
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA SO 35 7 6 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2025-26 · Michigan Tech
+23.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11301
Forward overall
#506
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.