IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Lambert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Everett Silvertips WHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1216 0.1216 0.6134 0.6134
2020-21 — NA3HL 23 14 9 23 1.000 0.1255 0.1255 0.3157 0.3157
2021-22 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 29 14 28 42 1.448 0.1818 0.1861 0.3518 0.3660
2022-23 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 46 24 42 66 1.435 0.1801 0.1762 0.4530 0.4432
2023-24 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 43 19 32 51 1.186 0.1488 0.1384 0.3744 0.3483
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 25 3 8 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2025-26 · Hamline
+234.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15681
Forward overall
#773
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Pizzimenti
Concordia · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Dunagan
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Nemgar
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.