← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Sydor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Calgary · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Kamloops Blazers WHL 15 1 5 6 0.400 0.1946 0.1946 0.9771 0.9771
2021-22 Kamloops Blazers WHL 63 10 11 21 0.333 0.1622 0.1607 0.8142 0.8067
2022-23 Kamloops Blazers WHL 68 12 16 28 0.412 0.2003 0.1891 1.0059 0.9497
2023-24 Kamloops Blazers WHL 56 29 16 45 0.804 0.3910 0.3499 1.9630 1.7566
2024-25 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 22 7 6 13 0.591 0.3118 0.3344 1.7315 1.8571
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 14 0 2 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Alaska Fairbanks
-51.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15249
Forward overall
#751
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2001-02
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2010-11
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.