← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Semeniuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-21 Country: Canada
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Vancouver Giants WHL 56 8 5 13 0.232 0.1129 0.1234 0.5695 0.6224
2022-23 Vancouver Giants WHL 54 12 10 22 0.407 0.1982 0.2073 0.9996 1.0457
2023-24 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 50 8 16 24 0.480 0.2335 0.2328 1.1778 1.1741
2024-25 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 53 14 14 28 0.528 0.2570 0.2425 1.2963 1.2230
2025-26 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 63 16 27 43 0.682 0.3320 0.2979 1.6747 1.5025
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17453
Forward overall
#919
Forward born in 2005
#638
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2023-24
0.29
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
BCHL 2018-19
0.82
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
AJHL 2014-15
0.24
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
BCHL 2023-24
0.11
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.