IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Miguel Marques Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-08 Country: Canada
2024 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #87  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — WHL 10 2 4 6 0.600 0.2919 0.3318 1.4702 1.6713
2022-23 — WHL 59 8 12 20 0.339 0.1649 0.1798 0.8307 0.9055
2023-24 — WHL 67 28 46 74 1.105 0.5373 0.5592 2.7064 2.8169
2024-25 Lethbridge Hurricanes WHL 29 14 24 38 1.310 0.6375 0.6295 3.2106 3.1701
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 33 10 13 23 0.697
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.56
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2025-26 · Maine
+24.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5522
Forward overall
#131
Forward born in 2006
#184
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.61 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Suess
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.