← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Van Mulligen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-26 Country: Canada
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 13 2 1 3 0.231 0.1123 0.1242 0.5638 0.6235
2022-23 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 68 1 8 9 0.132 0.0644 0.0682 0.3234 0.3426
2023-24 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 68 2 20 22 0.324 0.1574 0.1590 0.7902 0.7981
2024-25 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 50 3 24 27 0.540 0.2627 0.2513 1.3191 1.2618
2025-26 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 51 6 19 25 0.490 0.2385 0.2171 1.1974 1.0900
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5521
Defenseman overall
#1379
Defenseman born in 2005
#912
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
OJHL 2016-17
0.05
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.