← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Mittelsteadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-18 Country: Canada
Princeton
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 16 2 0 2 0.125 0.0608 0.0684 0.3067 0.3453
2022-23 WHL 53 4 3 7 0.132 0.0643 0.0694 0.3241 0.3497
2023-24 Kelowna Rockets WHL 67 3 28 31 0.463 0.2251 0.2318 1.1353 1.1692
2024-25 Vancouver Giants WHL 66 4 18 22 0.333 0.1622 0.1584 0.8178 0.7985
2025-26 Vancouver Giants WHL 61 4 10 14 0.230 0.1117 0.1039 0.5631 0.5238
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10466
Defenseman overall
#2230
Defenseman born in 2005
#1168
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Princeton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.36
actual FR PPG at Princeton
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Princeton
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.08
actual FR PPG at Princeton
AJHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Princeton

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.