← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-20 Country: Canada
Ferris State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Portland Winterhawks WHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Portland Winterhawks WHL 63 3 5 8 0.127 0.0618 0.0639 0.3116 0.3221
2023-24 Portland Winterhawks WHL 45 7 19 26 0.578 0.2811 0.2767 1.4177 1.3956
2024-25 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 52 16 27 43 0.827 0.4023 0.3745 2.0290 1.8890
2025-26 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 68 22 31 53 0.779 0.3792 0.3355 1.9124 1.6919
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11229
Forward overall
#516
Forward born in 2005
#418
in WHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Ferris State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2015-16
0.19
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
NAHL 2017-18
0.17
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
USHL 2020-21
0.22
actual FR PPG at Ferris State

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2014-15
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
1.036 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.