← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson Darby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-12-01 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Ferris State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Portland Winterhawks WHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Portland Winterhawks WHL 51 9 3 12 0.235 0.1145 0.1234 0.5774 0.6222
2024-25 Portland Winterhawks WHL 60 7 13 20 0.333 0.1622 0.1661 0.8178 0.8375
2025-26 Swift Current Broncos WHL 59 19 31 50 0.848 0.4123 0.4031 2.0795 2.0333
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19698
Forward overall
#847
Forward born in 2006
#721
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Ferris State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2020-21
0.43
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
AJHL 2019-20
0.52
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
USHL 2012-13
0.58
actual FR PPG at Ferris State
AJHL 2021-22
0.70
actual FR PPG at Ferris State

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2023-24
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2002-03
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.