← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aleksey Chichkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-21 Country: Canada
Mercyhurst
D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Merritt Centennials BCHL 31 1 6 7 0.226 0.0870 0.0943 0.3286 0.3560
2023-24 Calgary Hitmen WHL 61 1 9 10 0.164 0.0797 0.0804 0.4022 0.4059
2024-25 Prince George Cougars WHL 60 5 6 11 0.183 0.0892 0.0853 0.4498 0.4300
2025-26 Prince George Cougars WHL 61 4 13 17 0.279 0.1356 0.1233 0.6838 0.6220
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15861
Defenseman overall
#2990
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Mercyhurst Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2024-25
0.21
actual FR PPG at Mercyhurst
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Mercyhurst
USHL 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at Mercyhurst
NAHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Mercyhurst

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2008-09
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2003-04
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.