← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caelan Joudrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-17 Country: Canada
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Wenatchee Wild WHL 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.2085 0.2364 1.0517 1.1925
2024-25 Wenatchee Wild WHL 66 5 11 16 0.242 0.1179 0.1274 0.5948 0.6427
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 67 19 10 29 0.433 0.2106 0.2178 1.0620 1.0983
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32899
Forward overall
#530
Forward born in 2008
#1086
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2020-21
1.10
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
AJHL 2014-15
0.29
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2015-16
0.55
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2012-13
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2018-19
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.