← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caelan Joudrey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-17 Country: Canada
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Wenatchee Wild WHL 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.2085 0.2364 1.0469 1.1871
2024-25 Wenatchee Wild WHL 66 5 11 16 0.242 0.1179 0.1274 0.5921 0.6398
2025-26 Wenatchee Wild WHL 67 19 10 29 0.433 0.2106 0.2178 1.0572 1.0933
2026-27 Wenatchee Wild WHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1946 0.1946 0.9771 0.9771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33339
Forward overall
#606
Forward born in 2008
#1155
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.