IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isa Guram Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-10 Country: Canada
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Kamloops Blazers WHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 47 0 5 5 0.106 0.0518 0.0542 0.2611 0.2731
2025-26 Kamloops Blazers WHL 68 7 24 31 0.456 0.2218 0.2217 1.1186 1.1182
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14610
Defenseman overall
#1908
Defenseman born in 2007
#1361
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Hank Sorensen
USHL 2016-17
0.35
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Tyrell Boucher
AJHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Luke Voltin
USHL 2013-14
0.10
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Wolfgang Govedaris
OJHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Hale
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan Cook
Babson · 2001-02
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Campion
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2019-20
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.