← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isa Guram Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-10 Country: Canada
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Kamloops Blazers WHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 47 0 5 5 0.106 0.0518 0.0542 0.2599 0.2719
2025-26 Kamloops Blazers WHL 68 7 24 31 0.456 0.2218 0.2217 1.1136 1.1132
2026-27 Kamloops Blazers WHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1622 0.1622 0.8142 0.8142
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14799
Defenseman overall
#1965
Defenseman born in 2007
#1428
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
AJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHL 2018-19
0.13
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2014-15
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.