IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Meunier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-08-16 Country: Canada
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 68 14 15 29 0.426 0.2075 0.2302 1.0418 1.1559
2025-26 Prince Albert Raiders WHL 64 12 20 32 0.500 0.2432 0.2586 1.2213 1.2985
2026-27 Swift Current Broncos WHL 6 0 3 3 0.500 0.2432 0.2432 1.2213 1.2213
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24570
Forward overall
#416
Forward born in 2008
#909
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tanner Ludtke
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.70
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
Tristan Keck
MJHL 2013-14
0.22
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
Chayse Primeau
EHL 2015-16
0.24
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
Joey Abate
NAHL 2016-17
0.58
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2015-16
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2023-24
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.