IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan LeBret Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-15 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Tri-City Americans WHL 68 5 14 19 0.279 0.1359 0.1348 0.6856 0.6801
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12332
Defenseman overall
#1633
Defenseman born in 2007
#1259
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Samuel Duerr
BCHL 2020-21
0.40
actual FR PPG at Maine
Cameron Spicer
USHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
Tim Gould
SJHL 2018-19
0.18
actual FR PPG at Maine
Brandon Holt
NAHL 2019-20
0.46
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Johnson
Concordia · 2021-22
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexander Kenerson
Bowdoin · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Mahlmeister
SUNY Potsdam · 2019-20
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.