IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan LeBret Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-15 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Tri-City Americans WHL 68 5 14 19 0.279 0.1359 0.1348 0.6825 0.6771
2026-27 Tri-City Americans WHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0973 0.0973 0.4885 0.4885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12516
Defenseman overall
#1693
Defenseman born in 2007
#1325
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cameron Spicer
USHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
Samuel Duerr
NAHL 2021-22
0.40
actual FR PPG at Maine
Brian Morse
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
David Breazeale
NAHL 2019-20
0.48
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Mohler
Curry · 2006-07
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Eastman
Bethel · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Niks Krollis
Norwich · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.