← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carsten Kayter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-08-30 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Nebraska Omaha
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 52 5 24 29 0.558 0.1429 0.1646 0.4204 0.4844
2023-24 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 2 23 25 0.463 0.1784 0.1950 0.6738 0.7365
2024-25 Langley Rivermen BCHL 24 2 7 9 0.375 0.1445 0.1507 0.5457 0.5690
2025-26 Victoria Royals WHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10122
Defenseman overall
#2007
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Nebraska Omaha Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.06
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
MJHL 2015-16
0.29
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nebraska Omaha

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2016-17
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.