| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.000 | 1.1798 | 1.2339 | 6.0068 | 6.2824 |
| 2008-09 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 55 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 0.473 | 0.2788 | 0.2791 | 1.4197 | 1.4213 |
| 2009-10 | Waterloo Black Hawks | USHL | 60 | 35 | 33 | 68 | 1.133 | 0.6685 | 0.6265 | 3.4038 | 3.1899 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Wisconsin | D1 | BigTen | SR | 33 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 0.818 |
| 2012-13 | Wisconsin | D1 | WCHA-orig | JR | 41 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 0.732 |
| 2011-12 | Wisconsin | D1 | WCHA-orig | SO | 37 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 0.703 |
| 2010-11 | Wisconsin | D1 | WCHA-orig | FR | 41 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.415 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.