← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Barnes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-13 Country: USA
Wentworth
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 1 1 1 2 2.000 1.1798 1.2339 6.0068 6.2824
2008-09 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 55 9 17 26 0.473 0.2788 0.2791 1.4197 1.4213
2009-10 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 35 33 68 1.133 0.6685 0.6265 3.4038 3.1899
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Wisconsin D1 BigTen SR 33 13 14 27 0.818
2012-13 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig JR 41 15 15 30 0.732
2011-12 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig SO 37 11 15 26 0.703
2010-11 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-orig FR 41 5 12 17 0.415
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2010-11 · Wisconsin
-0.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5160
Forward overall
#249
Forward born in 1990
#253
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Wentworth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

1.78
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
1.41
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
0.67
actual FR PPG at Wentworth
1.25
actual FR PPG at Wentworth

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.