icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO | SVe Factor | Age-Adj SV% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | — | NOJHL | 6 | 2 | 2 | 90.5% | 3.79 | 0 | 0.9700 | 85.6% |
| 2024-25 | — | OJHL | 4 | 2 | 2 | 86.5% | 3.67 | 0 | 0.9700 | 81.0% |
| 2023-24 | — | AJHL | 2 | 0 | 1 | 35.7% | 20.00 | 0 | 0.9700 | 36.4% |
| 2021-22 | — | AJHL | 2 | 0 | 2 | 85.3% | 6.03 | 0 | 0.9700 | 95.2% |
| Season | School | Div | GP | W | L | SV% | GAA | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Westfield State | D3 | 6 | — | — | 92.0% | 2.29 | — |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D1.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | NCAA SV% | NCAA GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob Biron | CCHL | 90.9% | 86.1% | Army | 92.3% | 1.68 |
| Jared Moe | USHL | 90.7% | 85.9% | Minnesota | 91.5% | 2.46 |
| Ryan Bischel | USHL | 90.5% | 85.5% | Notre Dame | 91.5% | 2.52 |
| Evan Fear | USHL | 90.8% | 85.7% | Quinnipiac | 77.4% | 6.56 |
| Calvin Vachon | USHL | 89.6% | 84.4% | Alaska Fairbanks | 89.7% | 3.11 |
Historical goalies with similar age-adjusted SVe profiles who went on to play NCAA D2/D3.
| Name | Junior League | Junior SV% | Adj SVe | College | Div | SV% | GAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Fromolz | NA3HL | 92.0% | 87.1% | Marian | D3 | 88.3% | 3.85 |
| Ryan Kenny | USPHL-Premier | 93.5% | 89.3% | Stevenson | D3 | 89.6% | 2.95 |
| Jarret Bovarnick | EHL | 88.3% | 87.8% | Suffolk | D3 | 87.2% | 4.52 |
| Zach Dosan | NA3HL | 92.1% | 87.8% | Gustavus Adolphus | D3 | 72.5% | 6.60 |
| Andrew Doran | NA3HL | 93.4% | 87.1% | Utica | D3 | 100.0% | — |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.