← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oscar Plandowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-18 Country: Canada
2021 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #155  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 60 0 12 12 0.200 0.0994 0.0994 0.5334 0.5334
2020-21 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 39 5 12 17 0.436 0.2167 0.2167 1.1625 1.1625
2021-22 Charlottetown Islanders QMJHL 64 4 13 17 0.266 0.1321 0.1326 0.7084 0.7108
2022-23 QMJHL 64 6 13 19 0.297 0.1476 0.1409 0.7918 0.7558
2023-24 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 67 5 18 23 0.343 0.1707 0.1545 0.9156 0.8288
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 28 0 2 2 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2025-26 · New Hampshire
-49.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10178
Defenseman overall
#2208
Defenseman born in 2003
#1733
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.