IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan O'Donoghue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 39 6 2 8 0.205 0.1210 0.1192 0.6160 0.6067
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 38 15 28 43 1.132
2012-13 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 41 12 24 36 0.878
2011-12 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SO 39 8 12 20 0.513
2010-11 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 37 10 10 20 0.540
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2010-11 · Mercyhurst
+429.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41479
Forward overall
#1461
Forward born in 1991
#3565
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Johansen
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Lay
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Reed
Curry · 2008-09
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.