← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alix Durocher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-25 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 56 7 11 18 0.321 0.1579 0.1681 0.8580 0.9134
2024-25 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 64 15 32 47 0.734 0.3608 0.3664 1.9606 1.9908
2025-26 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 35 13 18 31 0.886 0.4351 0.4212 2.3645 2.2892
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12457
Forward overall
#474
Forward born in 2006
#460
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
AJHL 2017-18
0.20
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2018-19
0.56
actual FR PPG at Niagara
BCHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.