← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Rosensteel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-30 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Princeton
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Brooks Bandits BCHL 41 4 8 12 0.293 0.1128 0.1176 0.4260 0.4442
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 44 26 24 50 1.136 0.4379 0.4405 1.6538 1.6637
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16674
Forward overall
#683
Forward born in 2006
#683
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG

Princeton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.61
actual FR PPG at Princeton
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at Princeton
USHL 2017-18
0.19
actual FR PPG at Princeton
BCHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Princeton

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.