IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Gionta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-10 Country: USA
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 57 19 25 44 0.772 0.2836 0.3005 0.8147 0.8634
2024-25 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 57 28 37 65 1.140 0.4190 0.4221 1.2037 1.2125
2025-26 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 44 16 26 42 0.955 0.3507 0.3360 1.0075 0.9653
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9678
Forward overall
#407
Forward born in 2005
#229
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tyson Zimmer
BCHL 2024-25
0.29
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Spencer Young
OJHL 2023-24
0.35
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Trevor Poeze
CCHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Shane Ott
NAHL 2020-21
0.50
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Culhane
Neumann · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Gibson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.