IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddex Marmulak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-31 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Acadie-Bathurst Titan QMJHL 60 15 11 26 0.433 0.2129 0.2279 1.1570 1.2385
2025-26 Newfoundland Regiment QMJHL 64 12 15 27 0.422 0.2073 0.2121 1.1266 1.1527
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26942
Forward overall
#878
Forward born in 2007
#811
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Charlie Major
USHL 2022-23
0.64
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Parker Murray
BCHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Ryan Walsh
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sullivan Mack
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2001-02
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Triggs
Concordia · 2019-20
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.