← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddex Marmulak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-31 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Acadie-Bathurst Titan QMJHL 60 15 11 26 0.433 0.2129 0.2279 1.1567 1.2382
2025-26 Newfoundland Regiment QMJHL 64 12 15 27 0.422 0.2073 0.2121 1.1263 1.1524
2026-27 Newfoundland Regiment QMJHL 7 3 1 4 0.571 0.2807 0.2807 1.5254 1.5254
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27336
Forward overall
#921
Forward born in 2007
#822
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
AJHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
BCHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
BCHL 2016-17
0.36
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.